Discussion Essay

The Stranger is Albert Camus first and best known work . It is a book on the Philosophy of the Absurd and to a fault an empiric philosopher philosopher Albert Camus , himself , summarizes the book up in one sentence . He states that , I have summarized The Stranger a long metre then(prenominal) by a sentence which I accept to be kinda paradoxical - In our society every troops who does non cry at his mother s funeral risks beingness sentenced to finale - I valued to say that the hero of the book is sentenced to ending because he doesn t renovate the game The book , The Stranger , is an existential philosopher piece . The emotionlessness that the character of Meursault shows is a homophileifestation of the existentialist school of thinking . The immobility of Meursault isolates him from the rest of society and regular from the people that he loves . through and through the progression of the story we bring down to a greater extent and more of the honesty of Meursault which is a channel of observation for his indifference towards authentic practices in societyThe Honesty that Meursault uses to piece of musicifest his indifference is clearly shown in this handing over Why do you reject to see me he said . I rep imposition ind that I didn t cogitate in ne plus ultra . He wanted to know whether I was quite convinced(predicate) about that and I said I had no yard for asking myself that question : it didn t seem to emergence (p . 111 . Rather than lie and get a chance at freedom , Meursault tells the lawfulness and is seen as an outsider through that perform . T here is no other ultimate measure of soldiery s honesty as when he is confronted with the question of his own cosmos When man is confronted with a choice to decide whether or non he will lie or tell the truth in to save his bread and butter , it is oft! en said that the two-faced man would sooner remain a lie foregone die for the truth . In this passage , Meursault reveals that he would kinda die than betray his convictionsThese excerpts also reveal that Meursault has no theology . The manners that is given up to man is not a compassion it is more of an obligation . The leave out of a God and then creates a loss of focalization . There is no genius of purpose in life , in that location is no past , no future , and thither is only the kick in which Meursault lives because he feels that he is given no other choiceExistentialism does not apprehension itself with the concept of God or neither does it posit the guess that man s existence is dependent upon a higher being . Analogously , there is no higher deity that governs man and sets the standards . The only thing that is relevant in existentialism is the present . There is no future , there is no past (Todd 37 . This passage clearly shows Meursault s embodim ent of existentialism as he shows here that he really does not pity about time Today or tomorrow does not mean anything to Meursault . regular at his mother...If you want to get a full essay, enjoin it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay