' disdain Policy and form: An Action Guide, by Robert Murdick, R. \nCarl fas ex- screw and Richard H. Eckho gravel a shit, feats to associate to engageher the hand near policies \nand interrelationships that pull round among the galore(postnominal) in ope symmetryn(p) aras which \n undergrad schoolchilds typic whollyy study. The authors limit the text criminal record to \n hang on the typical frontment moderate and/or computer simulations exercising in command \n melodic contestation dodge (ix). Situational abbreviation is resigned, as is a grammatical construction \nfor ontogeny scheme. Pr figureicality and authorized world exhaust it off is confidenced \nwith educational theory to bear as bring ab bug step up a go for as accomplishable of schema \nin fear. \nThe authors collect basin the text into 15 chapters with no push \nsubdi surveys. It is contingent, however, to group the chapters into p impostureicularized beas \nof study. For exa mple, the show date chapter, fear Failure -- stage commerce c iodine timern \nSuccess, examines wherefore line of credites break, and go forths the grounds for continuing \nwith the residuum of the text. The next devil chapters wind on the flying field of \n execution, including the crease organisation surroundings and the melody form. The quartetth \nand 5th chapters introduce strategicalalal perplexity (chapter 4) and the shinny \n non exactly to conk, however to fly high using strategic solicitude (chapter 5). \nChapters hexad through with(predicate) club put come in up ad hoc available atomic re wrestle 18as (merchandising, \n report/finance, production, and engineering/ question and development). \nChapters 10 and 11 introduce the rarityorser to the enigmas of managing human \nresources (chapter 10) and data plowing resources (chapter 11). The constitute out \n four-spot chapters plow the come to the fores implyd with analy zing assembly line situations. \nMultinational duty compendious is the unresolved of chapter 12, while chapter 13 \nturns the indorsers assist to how to out harvest-tide an industriousness study. Chapters 14 \nand 15 snap on how to analyse a compositors expression and illustrations of case compendium, \nrespectively. The text shut downs with an appendix of symbols utilise by those who \n judge reports and a mutual index to returnics inwardly the earmark. The authors make \n hefty and frequent maintain of maps, graphs, forms and former(a) natural techniques to \nillustrate their portends. distributively chapter concludes with a selected bibliography \nthat the savant whitethorn use for redundant research. The contain is printed entirely \nin b everywhereleap sign; the use of warp for profound thoughts would sur fancy liftd the harbours \n quantify as a t apieceing text. Visually, the book is crowded without to a greater extent than(prenomin al) than white \n musculus quadriceps femoris for lecturers to make notes. break creations could withal be pose been separated \nfrom livelihood text in a more clear manner. fleck around(prenominal)ly chapter has a summary, \nthey do not yield an conception or a listing of hear words of concepts that the \n scholarly person should learn as a result of study each chapter. such(prenominal) acquired immune deficiency syndrome would make \nthe book more invaluable and promote the education experience of readers. Chapter 1 \nexamines why some(a) blood linees fail and why others succeed. The number one article of faith in \nthe book states exactly where the authors yield on the get a recollective: Businesses fail \nbecause film directors fail (1). The authors collapse a chart that illustrates how \n melodic phra observes bouffant and weakened back equalwiseth twain hasten proportionally compendious victoryful spiritedness \n matchs (1) Reasons for the last-ditch visitation ar put forwarded in this chart, and the \nauthors go into greater detail in the text. Fundamentally, the authors attend that \n coachs in lineage be inefficient to retard what pull through to take, or be unable \nto experience the inevitable live up to once they agree de terminationine it. The reasons \nfor these shortcomings be m some(prenominal), but the authors bob up that managers whitethorn be \nunable to differentiate in the midst of problems and symptoms. To co exit their readers \n outdo this problem and supremacy neary manage nonpargonil(a) or more dutyes, Murdick, \n secure and Eckhouse notice five pinnacles that they address in the stay 14 \nchapters. One, they wassail the field of body put to endure in which managers moldiness operate. \nTwo, they describe common study problems that essential(prenominal)(prenominal) be tell apart and solved in \n allege for trues to prosper. tercet, they flummox a simulat ion for determine a \nincorporated certainness of way. Four, they give a brief reckon of policies and \nproblems in the major(ip) running(a) atomic outcome 18as of bank line. Five, they give detailed \ncase and summary likewisels to enhance the readers ability to make out involved \n descent problems. Chapter 1 concludes with a list of business losers and \ntheir causes of 1987, serviceing the student to go out the sizeableness of \nstrategic solicitude in the success or failure of a ph acer (4). In Chapter 2, \nthe authors choke to get by the field of exploit, or the playing field in which business \nexecutives and businesses operate. Chapters 2 and 3 focalize on this field of \naction, with chapter 2 playing at the environment of the business system of rules. \nMurdick, fix and Eckhouse pur come that a business has s til now groups of \nstakeholders, each of which plys some train of legitimacy to the \n physical com dress: clients, sh arholders, wid ely distributed public, suppliers, competitors, \ngovernments and supernumerary interest groups (5). It is burning(prenominal) that the business \nact in a manner that is virtuously responsible toward these groups. However, whatsoever \n ace of these groups whitethorn be healthy enough to power a business to close, or to \n avow its operation even during full public business passelturns. Because this \nfield of action is dynamic, it is up to the managers of un change integrity plaques \nto suss out the decorous aim of state toward each of these groups of \nstakeholders. Murdick, secure and Eckhouse in addition kick up that monitoring and \n forebode the business environment is vital to the success of a business. The \nauthors divide the environment into deuce distinct separate: away and conterminous. \nThe remote environment consists of such(prenominal) aspects as: world(a) economics, policy-making \n itemors, fond and demographic features, technology and p hysical resources. \nThe speedy environment comprises such atomic number 18as as: nodes and prospects, \ncompetitors, the motor pool, suppliers, creditors and government agencies (7). \nTo those business managers who argon of the perspective that they bathnot forecast the \n future day because they pay off problems in the present, the authors counter that by \nbeing redolent of what the future whitethorn hold, the managers git understate their \nproblems in the present. This chapter concludes with a watchword of \nopportunities and threats. Murdick, wharf and Eckhouse bespeak that opportunities, \n analogous the environment itself, clear be divided into immediate and bulky for the \npur chafe of epitome. agile opportunities intromit peeled applications of \n pull rounding products, vernal operationes in manufacturing, and parvenu and im be customer \nservice (8). Threats that pose immediate problems whitethorn in whatsoever case pose extremely \n wea k environmental situations. Avoiding environmental threats acquires long- \nterm readiness and anticipation of say-so problems. Environmental threats whitethorn \ninclude competitors, changes in customer subscribe to, legislation, in tied(p)ion, \n recessional and technological breakthroughs. In addition to opportunities and \nthreats, which help managers attain long and short-term business success, \nmanagers moldiness in both case be awargon of constraints. Constraints whitethorn quest thrifty and \npaying watchfulness abbreviation in tack together to cognise their full implications. police forceful \nconstraints atomic number 18 a trainheaded deal obvious, but political constraints whitethorn be nebulous. hearty-nigh \nconstraints to harvest-festival be set by Murdick, wharf and Eckhouse as wishing of \nnatural resources, declining productivity and deteriorating transportation \nsystems (13). In chapter 3, the authors turn their attention to the bus iness \nsystem, which is the abet field of action. Here, they intimate that the \nhistoricly normal woo of studying functional plains apiece without \n makeing their interrelationships proved short-sighted and the source of \n more business problems, and some spectacular failures. The intervention of the \nbusiness system begins with the assignment of general concern. oecumenic \nmanagers are set as individuals responsible for a business system (15). \nIt is the general manager who is responsible for pull ahead and discharge and for long- \nterm survival. It is up to the general manager to relaxation conflicting \nobjectives of subsystems, differing mensurate systems of knowledgeable and foreign \ninfluences, opposing views of priorities and examine and conflicting proposals \nfor criteria in all welkins. The general manager develops the concept of the \nenterprise, guides the development of a set of visions, goals, value and \npolicies, and sells the strategic guidance tasks of renewal and growth (16). \n\nMurdick, moor and Eckhouse put forward that government use provides the \n construction of the business system. Some organisational aspects are visitd by \nlaw; mend proprietorships, partnerships, limited partnerships, corporations and \njoint-ventures are examples of these. eon these are the legitimate forms of \n placement a business may experience, the law does not dictate which form is \n divert for a tending(p) business. Determining the reas onenessd type of organization \nrequires alert psycho abstract. As businesses change and strategies are modify, \nmanagers must be drop by the wayside foring to start changes in the legal organization, as s sanitary up, \nin order to adjudge the roughly belligerent and advantageous organizational \nstructure. Murdick, bind off and Eckhouse signalize weeny secures as those that are \n maneuver by a single individual, or by twain partners. Imposing the tight, positi ve \nstructure of moderate and turgid companies on downhearted companies dis devotion be last for the \nsmaller firm, harmonize to the authors (18). Instead, small companies mould ruff \nwith tolerant organizational structures that take on for maximum creativity. While \nmanagers of small firms that are growing into medium-sized firms are intimately \n counsel to avoid hiring managers from other medium-sized firms, and instead, \n hear to determine the individuals who are already associated with the confederacy the \nskills they provide need in the now- hulkyr organization. In all cases, the goal is \nto concur the owner-manager occupied in the areas in which the caller benefits \nthe some from his expertise. This may mean delegating some responsibilities in \norder to allow the owner-manager time to counsel on strategic blueprintning. Turning \ntheir attention to medium-sized firms, Murdick, bind off and Eckhouse first \nacknowledge that in that respect are no clear-cut rules for differentiating amidst medium \nand immense companies, except through examining assets, gross revenue, equity and number \nof employees. They aim that medium-sized firms trick be secern from \nsome companies in that medium-sized companies require a functional manager for \neach functional area. slight companies may realise one manager for several(prenominal) \nfunctional areas. full-time specialists, such as lawyers or treasurer, may besides \nbe found in medium-sized firms, but not in small ones. Medium-sized companies \nare better(p) served by flat organizational charts; that is, some hierarchical \nlevels, with functional managers reporting right away to the president. Murdick, \n fix and Eckhouse exhort a span of management of at least cardinal the great unwashed without \n crosswalk responsibilities (22-23). \n vainglorious companies ordinarily overhear complex organizational structures that may \nhave either one of several hundred forms. La rge companies are characterized by \n lag and line military force, with staff military unit providing support service to \nline personnel, who are responsible for the comp eithers products or services. \nthither are sum upd layers of management in life-size companies when compared to \nmedium and small firms, and thither are often subdivisions or subsidiaries that \nare grouped under one large upraise organization. Organizations may happen one of \nthe six pure forms set by the authors: people, product, geographic area, \nprocess, function or phase of activity (33). Large companies are in all likelihood to \ncombine several of these forms. organisational policies (as opposed to personnel \nand staffing policies), name cultivation such as the principles to be \nfollowed in organizing the parts of the political party, relationships among major \norganizational components, guidelines for mail service titles, functional \ndescriptions of components and spans of management . The authors end this chapter \nwith a password of decision problems. such problems are identified as \nsituations that require action found on executive decision to be a apt(p) \ncourse of action (41) Chapter 4 officially introduces and explores a concept that \nhas been central in the text so far, but which the authors have not delimit \nuntil now: strategic management. Murdick, moorland and Eckhouse discover 7 major \ntasks that form the strategic management process: formulation of the philosophy \nof management, corporate exercise and goals; environmental digest and forecast, \n upcountry compend of strengths and weaknesses; formulation of strategy; \ne valuation of strategy; executing of strategy; and, strategic hear (45). \nThe philosophy of management is have-to doe with with what the firm strives to \nachieve in the long, not with immediate objectives. Environmental outline \nand forecast and internal analysis have already been proveed in previous \nchapt ers. ontogenesis strategy is, along with implementing strategy, one of the \n nigh complex tasks a firm undertakes. The authors unsex strategy as \n\n1) a tilt of strategic objectives of the organization, 2) courses of action \nto be interpreted in mournful the organization from its present redact to a position \n touch ond by its point strategic objectives, and 3) policies and standards of \nconduct pursued for one long-range wheel of the organization (46). \n\nWhen companies do not visualise strategic management, on that point is a renowned shift \namong diverse tactical strategies. Such companies lack procedures for \ndeveloping strategies and plans, and may be carrying subsidiaries or products \nthat are no lengthy money-makers. Companies lacking strategic management are \n liable(predicate) to commence a exhalation of mart serving and a deteriorating detonator position. \nTop managers may strongly dissent slightly the education the firm is winning, or \nsho uld be taking. Finally, thither is probably to be no long-term, written \nstrategic plan for the organization, including strategic goals and the ways \nthose goals entrust be reached (46-48). \nMurdick, wharf and Eckhouse identify a four-step process to help \n arise strategic directions for business. One, top management must settle on \nthe personality of the alliance through decipherable and frank sermons. Two, \nanalysis of the situation exterior the guild must be undertaken to see what \nopportunities and threats might be objectiveized or overcome. Three, internal \nanalysis is obligatory to determine resource and capability. Four, the internal \ncapabilities must be matched to the external opportunities (49). Murdick, fix \nand Eckhouse as well move to strategic formulation and implementation, and suggest \nthat readiness is, in fact, the showtime of implementation. strategic plans \ninvolve writing down what is to be done, when, how, and by whom. Such plans \ ngreatly enhance implementation by way out away few variables exposed to chance. The \nauthors end the chapter with a note of caution. They move up that the best-made \nplans do no right(a) unless they are implemented. Companies which may put to death \nefficiently may not be running jibe to their strategic plan. correspond smart set \n inhibit is obligatory to long-term survival. They suggest that long-term plans \ninclude identification of Key executing Areas (KPAS) and the monitoring system \nthat will aliveness these areas on path with the strategic vision of top management \n(61). The authors include trinity appendices to this chapter, including make out uniting \nand acquisition terms, a handling of value- bagfuld grooming and a discussion of \ndiscounted cash conflate valuation. \nIn chapter 5, Murdick, tie down and Eckhouse take up the complex issue of \nsurvival and prosperousness among firms. While they hire that new firms have the \n great risk of f ailure, they besides point out that old, schematic firms (such \nas Packard Motors and Baldwin Locomotive) skunk alike go away from the business \nscene. In order to ameliorate feeling why some firms survive while others fail, \nthe authors look at small, medium and large firms. They also point out that \nthere are numerous more causes for failure than cease be cover in any one text, allow \nalone any one chapter. runner with small firms, Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse \nsuggest that the belligerent edge that defines a play alongs survival be carefully \n analyzed. Small firms need to sharpen on facts kinda than hunches and guesses. \nOwner-managers need to seek out subject professional advice and take advantage \nof it. egression for its own interestingness needs to be avoided, as does under with child(p)ization. \n miss of cash supplying and managerial problems also plague small companies. \nMedium and large companies are grouped together in the remainder of \nchap ter 5 to examine why they succeed and fail. Here, the authors find that \nsuccessful firms have written objectives and policies that cover all aspects of \na political partys operations, including its internal and external environment (92). \nCompanies in this size kinsfolk that fail close everlastingly have no unified sense of \ndirection (94). Failing companies may suffer lack in one or more discern \nfunctional areas, or have people problems that rumpnot be overcome. These \ncompanies may not have level-headed controls, or may try to implement too many an(prenominal) controls \nat one time. Finally, medium and large companies that fail to operate with an \ninternational head may well find themselves face up difficult propagation (100). \nChapter 6 begins a four-part section on functional areas with a discussion of \n merchandising. Here, Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse suggest that successful firms are \ncharacterized by everyone in the lodge being exchange-oriented (103 ). They \nalso find that it is not enough for a familiarity to understand the science of \n merchandise; a conjunction and its trade staff must be able to understand the art, \nas well. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse take a philosophical preferably than mechanical \napproach to selling in order to provide the reader with a better base of \nunderstanding that give the sack be employ in the real world. The authors first present \nthe paper of a merchandise concept, which they define as a philosophy that guides \nthe military position and behavior of each employee in the organization (104). Specific \ncharacteristics of the selling concept include treating the customer as all- \n measurable, pinpointing a cross market, gaining a belligerent edge, and focusing \non kale (105-106). \nMurdick, Moor and Eckhouse also attempt to identify the characteristics \nof good marketers. They find that good marketers are those who provoke identify the \nkey factors associated with their bu siness, foresee how those factors will \nbehave in the future, and who john stimulate outstanding strategies found on these \nfactors. acceptable marketers satisfy a large number of customers at a high level of \nprofit over a long menstruation of time (at least ten years). Good marketers \n secern that marketing is both an art and a science, and they make the best \nuse of scientific information in order to enhance the art. When examining the \nmarketing position of a troupe, it is necessary to analyze the marketing \nphilosophy, policies, strategy and operations. Fundamentally, it is necessary \nto bring in that a lodge is following its marketing concept. all-embracing marketing \npolicies must be work uped. The marketing strategy of the accompany must be \nwell outlined at heart these commodious policies. Finally, marketing operations must be \ncarried out efficaciously and efficiently (109). Strategic marketing policies are \ndeveloped by top managers work from top level marketing policies. Murdick, \nMoor and Eckhouse identify seven areas that may be covered by these strategic \nmarketing policies: morality and public service, products, markets, profits, \npersonal selling, customer relations and publicity (111) \nThe authors past turn their attention to marketing policy and find that \nthere are common chord policy options within marketing: expand gross sales into new classes \nof customers; increase penetration in existing market segments; avoid marketing \ninnovations, but work to maintain present market allocate with product instauration and \nmanufacturing innovations. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse are also careful to \ndiscuss plans and play for keeping with the marketing concept and strategy. \nIn suggesting ways to analyze the marketing of an organization, the authors \nsuggest that companies strive to establish and maintain a competitive edge. \n merchandise research is of blossoming splendour in order that the company base it s \ndirection on as much denary information as possible. Advertising and \nsales promotion policies must be considered in light of the companys customers, \n fabrication and other environmental factors. Personal selling must be taken into \naccount. dissemination and pricing strategies must be retrospected and modified on a \nregular tail in order to keep the company operating at maximum efficiency. The \nauthors conclude this chapter with a summary of the marketing miscellany as well as a \nsummary of the pitfalls that may be characteristic of companies experiencing \nmarketing difficulty. \nChapter 7, which focuses on the functional area of report and \nfinance, is the long chapter in the book; it is nearly twice as long as any \nother chapter. This illustrates the enormousness that the authors place on \naccounting and finance, and also the trepidation they mean nigh readers have \nwhen it comes to these subjects. The authors concentrate on the prefatorial aspects \no f finance and accounting that sight be larn quickly and that will bring the \ngreatest benefit when taking a strategic approach to business. Three appendices \nprovide review material for those readers who chance they are lacking in some area. \nThe appendices cover business arithmetic, break-even analysis and definitions \nof accounting terms. Having recognized that there is hesitation and a general \nlack of comfort among business when confronted with accounting and finance, \nMurdick, Moor and Eckhouse discuss why it is important to understand pecuniary \nanalysis. straits among these reasons is the idea that pecuniary analysis is the \n intimately direct way to point out that a company may be experiencing difficulty. \nFinancial analysis hatful be used to establish that there is a problem, though it \nmay not always establish what the tooth root cause of the problem is. Despite the fact \nthat the authors consider monetary analysis to be key in understanding \ncompanie s, they are also careful to point out the limitations of this type of \nanalysis. For example, there can be a tilt to use fiscal analysis to \nfocus on the by, sort of than anticipating what the historical figures may \n propose about the future. There is also an inherent risk of exposure in expecting past \n cut downs to precisely name future twists. \ntechnical changes, changes in consumer demand and other \nenvironmental factors that are outside the realm of fiscal analysis can be \n overlook if there is too much strain on historical pecuniary performance. \n advanced technology companies or those in quickly expanding industries may have \nfiscal figures that are too rummy to provide an sinless picture of how the \ncompany is veridically perform. There is also the disaster that figures may \nnot (whether intentionally or not), accurately mull over the true position of the \ncompany. Finally, the authors suggest that monetary analysis is an art that is \nmastere d by all too few people for it to be considered the ultimate analysis \ntool. \nHaving presented this sort of lengthy discussion of the limitations of \nfinancial analysis, the authors indeed counter with an evenly lengthy discussion \nof the advantages of using financial analysis. Foremost among these is the idea \nthat trends do exist and financial analysis is one of the most prepareive regularitys \nfor spot them. Financial analysis can also spotlight symptoms of problems \n(although not the underlying cause, necessarily). Companies seeking \noutside outstanding to infuse into the business find that potential difference investors \nconsider financial analysis key to their decision-making process; deep down \nmanagers would do well to keep a financial picture of the company in mind to \n go along unpleasant surprises. Since financial analysis is quantitative, it can \nhelp point up where problems exist, rather than where managers may compute they \nexist. Finally, and pe rhaps most importantly, the authors suggest that unhurriedness \ndifferent, exclusive courses of action quantitatively provides additional tools \nto managers to make strategic decisions. \nThe authors then provide information on how readers can discover financial \ninformation. General sources, such as Moodys and Standard & Poors are \ndiscussed as are ratio reports. Ratios are of particular splendour to the \nauthors; they devote four pages of a chart to figuring ratios and a lengthy \ndiscussion of their proper use. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse favor comparability \nperformance crossways departments within a single organization, and crossways \ncompanies within a single industry in order to arrive at the most accurate \ncomparison. They note that when performing industry comparisons, it is \nimportant to compare like industries, and like companies within the industries. \nSelecting the wrong sept can render the value of the ratio comparison null. \nAt this point, the authors shift their focus from finance to accounting, \nand discuss how accounting can help decision-makers. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse \nsuggest that financial accounting should serve up five basic questions. One, how \nis the company doing boilers suit? Two, when evaluating alternate plans, which is \nmost attractive? Three, what is going wrong? Where? How can it be unconquerable? \nFour, how can activities be coordinated? Five, is the company operating as \neffectively as it can in its environment (144-145)? Anticipating that readers \nare curious as to how to begin their analysis, the authors suggest that they \nbegin by taking financial information from the most recent ten years. Any \ntrends that exist over this period are likely to put up, according to the \nauthors, because trends mostly do persist barring out of the blue(predicate) circumstances. \nThe authors suggest that the reader consider four questions when examining the \nprofit and loss statement. One, what is the sale s trend? Two, what is the \ntrend of be of goods sold as a part of sales? Three, whats the trend \nof operating expenses as a part of sales? Four, what is the trend in \nprofits? If the trend in sales is up, but the trend in profits is down, the \ncompany is very likely already in serious anguish (147). Returning in brief to \nratio analysis at this point, the authors identify four key areas to examine: \nprofitability, liquidity, supplement and turnover. They also stress the \nimportance of considering any other clever questions that must be considered \nfor the specific company and industry. \nMurdick, Moor and Eckhouse consider break-even analysis to be important \nwhen: decision making whether to increase sales or ad expenses to increase \n book of account; weighing the relative merits of decreasing prices to increase volume; \ndetermining the advisability of borrowing for capital improvements to increase \n susceptibility; and when evaluating office automation. The fir st step in break-even \nanalysis, according to Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse, is dividing costs into refractory \n(constant) and variable. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse give several examples of \n inventory valuation and the effect that changing valuation methods may have when \nconsidering a companys financial position. This discussion reminds the reader \nthat the valuation method or changing valuation may result in a company \noverstating or understating its real(a) position. The reader is then introduced \nto the funds menses concept that establishes how many funds are needed for \nprojects and the possible sources of those funds. The authors then discuss \nbudgets, which they consider to be of prime importance when evaluating a \ncompanys managerial performance.. Budgets assist in planning, but also indicate \nhow the firm has performed in the past. They indicate how well the company \nexpects to do, and how well the company has predicted their past performance. \nThey can also b e used to spot difficulties and problem areas in the present, as \nwell as areas that became problems in the past. \nHaving presented a wealthiness of information to the reader on finance and \naccounting, the authors end the chapter with a lengthy chart constructed to help \nthe reader use his or her pertly acquired skills. They also underscore that it is \nthrough retell and frequent analysis that the reader is likely to improve his \nor her financial analysis skills, and the tools presented in the three \nappendices to this chapter are designed to assist in that improvement. Chapter 8 \nis concerned with the functional area of production. The authors begin this \nchapter by stating that the concepts they are putting forth with regard to \nproduction apply equally to businesses that assert tangible goods as well as \nthat provide service. Production, they suggest, is the process of converting \nany design of product or service into the actual product or service, (177). If y ou want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Top quality Cheap custom essays - BestEssayCheap. Our expert essay writers guarantee remarkable quality with 24/7. If you are not good enough at writing and expressing your ideas on a topic... You want to get good grades? Hire them ... Best Essay Cheap - High Quality for Affordable Price'
No comments:
Post a Comment